The £25 Billion Sizing Crisis: How Fashion's Fit Problem is Reshaping the Industry

THE DAILY FASHION CHRONICLE

Professional Fashion & Retail News

Industry experts warn that inconsistent clothing sizes are costing retailers billions annually while frustrating consumers and harming the environment

By Fashion & Retail Correspondent | Published Today

• • •

The Hidden Cost of Getting Dressed

When Sarah Mitchell, a 34-year-old marketing executive from London, orders a size 12 dress online, she never knows what will arrive. Last month alone, she returned three supposedly identical-sized garments: one too tight, one too loose, and one that fit perfectly—all bearing the same size label from different brands.

Mitchell's experience reflects a growing crisis in fashion retail. With online apparel return rates averaging 24.4% in the US—translating to $38 billion in returns annually—the fashion industry faces an unprecedented challenge that extends far beyond consumer frustration.

Economic Impact: In the UK alone, apparel returns cost the fashion industry £7 billion in 2022, according to the British Fashion Council. This staggering figure represents not just lost revenue, but a fundamental breakdown in the relationship between brands and consumers—one rooted in the chaotic world of clothing sizes.

The Anatomy of Sizing Chaos

The modern sizing system is, paradoxically, anything but systematic. There is no mandatory clothing size or labeling standard in the US, and manufacturers follow their own sizing charts to cater to their distinct customer bases. The UK faces similar challenges, with BS 3666:1982, the standard for women's clothing, rarely followed by manufacturers, resulting in variations between manufacturers and a tendency towards vanity sizing.

This lack of standardisation has created what industry insiders call "sizing anarchy." Different brands target different customers, and as a result, different body types. The fit, design, and measurements of a brand's clothing are a form of intellectual property, explains sizing expert Dr. Lynn Boorady from Buffalo State University.

The problem is compounded by "vanity sizing"—the practice of labeling clothing with smaller sizes than the actual measurements. Studies have shown that shoppers prefer to buy clothing labeled with small sizes because it boosts confidence. As the weight of the average American woman rose from 140 lb. in 1960 to 168.5 lb. in 2014, brands adjusted their metrics to help more customers squeeze into more-desirable sizes.

This psychological manipulation has created an arms race among retailers. A size 8 in 1980 might be labeled a 4—or even a 2—today, with no change in actual measurements. The result is a system where size labels have become virtually meaningless across brands.

The Economic Earthquake

The financial implications of sizing inconsistency extend far beyond individual returns. Fit issues account for 53% of apparel returns globally, with 93% of shoppers citing incorrect sizing or fit as a reason for returns. This has created what McKinsey & Company describes as a "returns epidemic" that threatens industry profitability.

A McKinsey Returns Management Survey conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic noted a 25% return rate for apparel on e-commerce channels, compared to 20% overall. Post-pandemic figures show even more alarming trends, with some fashion retailers experiencing return rates as high as 50%.

Key Financial Statistics:

• Returns cost e-commerce businesses approximately $816 billion annually worldwide

• 32% of customers would stop shopping with a brand after one bad sizing experience

• It costs apparel businesses $129 on average to acquire a single customer

• 48% of online shoppers engage in "bracketing" – purchasing multiple sizes with intent to return

Environmental Consequences

Environmental Crisis: Beyond economic losses, the sizing crisis has created an environmental disaster. In 2020, shipping returned items resulted in approximately 16 million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions, equivalent to the emissions generated by powering two million homes for a year.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates more than 85% of clothing and other textiles don't get recycled. Many returned items, particularly those returned out of season, end up in landfills rather than being resold. If a winter item gets returned at the beginning of the spring, there's no value in restocking it. "You just throw it away, and it ends up in a landfill", explains MIT Sloan researcher Dr. John Hauser.

The scale of waste is staggering. Industry estimates suggest that reducing return rates by just 10% globally could save over 2.4 million metric tonnes of CO₂ emissions annually.

The Psychology of Fit

The human impact of sizing inconsistency extends beyond mere inconvenience. Fashion psychologists note that ill-fitting clothes can significantly impact self-esteem and body image. The constant uncertainty about what size to order creates anxiety and decision fatigue that transforms what should be an enjoyable experience into a source of stress.

Approximately 48% of online shoppers engage in "bracketing"—purchasing multiple sizes with the intent to return ill-fitting items. This behaviour, while rational from a consumer perspective, places enormous strain on retail logistics and environmental resources.

The rise of "wardrobing"—purchasing clothing for a specific event with the intention of returning it afterwards—represents another dimension of the problem. This practice, enabled by liberal return policies, effectively turns retailers into unwitting rental services.

Historical Context: How We Got Here

The current crisis has deep historical roots. Women's standard sizes were originally developed from statistical data in the 1940s and 1950s, similar in concept to the European EN 13402 clothing size standard. However, these standards were based on limited and unrepresentative samples.

Historical Timeline:1939: The USDA measured 15,000 women to create a national sizing system—participants were largely white, low-income volunteers, hardly representative of the full population1958: The National Bureau of Standards created a system based on the hourglass figure using only bust size1983: The sizing standard was withdrawn entirely, leaving brands free to develop their own systems

This regulatory vacuum left brands free to develop their own sizing systems, leading to today's chaotic landscape.

International Perspectives

The sizing challenge varies significantly across global markets. Universal sizing works in China, for example, because "being plus-sized is so unusual, they don't even have a term for it," but America is home to women of many shapes and sizes, explains Professor Lynn Boorady.

Return rates range from 5% in Japan to 58% in Germany, reflecting different cultural attitudes toward returns and sizing expectations. In Japan, cultural norms discourage returns, with consumers viewing them as a failure in the purchasing decision. Japanese consumers expect personalised service pre-purchase, reducing the need for easy returns.

Technology to the Rescue

Innovative solutions are emerging to address the sizing crisis. Leading the charge in the UK is Tellar, which has developed sophisticated technology to match consumers with their perfect fit across over 1,500 clothing brands. Their platform allows customers to input their measurements once and receive accurate size recommendations across multiple retailers.

"Our mission is to enhance online fashion shopping by eliminating the guesswork of sizing," explains a Tellar spokesperson. "We're driven by a vision to reduce returns while making fashion accessible and enjoyable for everyone."

Other Technological Solutions Include:

AI-Powered Sizing: Bold Metrics' AI-driven sizing platform creates personalised sizing recommendations based on customer data and body measurements.

3D Body Scanning: Advanced scanning technology allows customers to create detailed body profiles for more accurate fit predictions.

Virtual Try-On: Amazon launched virtual try-on for shoes in June 2022 with its new mobile AR (augmented reality) tool. Walmart acquired virtual clothing try-on startup Zeekit in May 2021.

Predictive Analytics: MIT Sloan research shows that incorporating product images into existing predictive models improved return rate predictions by more than 13% and improved profits by more than 8%.

Industry Response

Forward-thinking retailers are implementing comprehensive strategies to address sizing challenges:

Enhanced Data Collection: Many retailers are training associates and improving their online return processes to collect more specific data on the reasons for returns, going well beyond "it doesn't fit".

Improved Size Guides: Companies are investing in more detailed sizing information, including model measurements and fit guides for different body types.

Flexible Policies: While maintaining profitability, retailers are developing more nuanced return policies that discourage bracketing while supporting genuine fit issues.

The Path Forward

Industry experts believe the solution lies not in universal sizing—which would likely exclude more body types than it includes—but in better technology and more transparent communication about fit.

Even without universal sizing, brands can improve their customer experience and foster loyalty through personalised recommendation experiences. The key is leveraging technology to create individual solutions rather than attempting to fit diverse body types into rigid categories.

Technology Impact: AI personalisation tools can reduce return rates by 20-30% while boosting conversion rates by 15-20%, according to industry research. This dual benefit—reduced returns and increased sales—makes technology investment attractive for retailers facing pressure on multiple fronts.

Regulatory Considerations

Policymakers are beginning to take notice of the sizing crisis. The European Union is exploring enhanced labeling requirements, while sustainability advocates push for regulations addressing the environmental impact of returns.

Amazon has introduced new apparel size attributes and standards to improve the shopping experience, requiring all U.S. apparel listings to include standardised size attributes. This marketplace-driven standardisation may prove more effective than traditional regulatory approaches.

Looking Ahead

The clothing sizing crisis represents a complex challenge requiring coordinated solutions across technology, regulation, and industry practices. Success will likely come not from imposing universal standards, but from embracing diversity and using technology to create personalised solutions.

As consumer demand for inclusive sizing grows, the limitations of relying solely on fit models are becoming more apparent. The future belongs to companies that can bridge the gap between mass production and individual fit through intelligent technology.

The Bottom Line: Retailers that solve the sizing puzzle will gain competitive advantage through reduced returns, increased customer loyalty, and improved sustainability credentials. Those that don't risk being left behind in an increasingly sophisticated marketplace.

• • •

Clothing Return Rates by Category

Product CategoryAverage Return RatePrimary ReasonDresses72%Fit issuesPants/Trousers65%Size discrepanciesShirts/Blouses45%Fit and styleShoes40%Size and comfortOuterwear35%Seasonal/styleUnderwear/Lingerie15%Hygiene restrictions

Source: Industry research compilation, 2024-2025

• • •

For more information about innovative sizing solutions, visit tellar.co.uk

The author can be reached for comments on this story.

© 2025 The Daily Fashion Chronicle. All rights reserved. your blog post here...